
Main Page List
ATV`s Choice Of Aerials (And Why We Chose Them.....)
The subjects on this page are listed in the following order :
ATV`s Choice of TV Aerials & The Great Wideband Debate (incl Benchmarked aerials)
Aerial Dimensions (and aerial box dimensions)
Major Transmitters (and which aerials they require)
(Also see ATV`s choice of FM / DAB aerials)
Our preferred model of Yagi18 Aerial, which is available in A, B, C/D, K and E groups.
These antennas have significantly better build quality than any X Beam aerial I`ve seen.
For loft mounted installs we`d recommend the XB10A or XB10B over the Yagi18A or Yagi18B.
The perfect aerial for reasonable signal areas. The strong construction of this 26 element aerial and its relatively compact size also make it well suited for use in boats and caravans as well as no houses. Only available in wideband.
We recommend our grouped Yagi18 (or if you have to go wideband, our DY14WB) for poor areas of reception. Despite being significantly smaller (wind loading wise) than most “high gain” wideband aerials, the group A will blow away any wideband antenna, and the group B outperform the vast majority of them. The version we stock has the best performance of all the Yagi18s on the market, it has a "balun", a cradle and a tilting clamp for poles up to 2”.
Last, but by no means least, these Yagi18s are one of the sturdiest aerials on the market. Many people replace Bacofoil aerials with these and are amazed at the difference in build quality, and you will be too....... I`ve always liked them, they`re one of my favourites.
For gain figures see test results. For dimensions see table.
See Aerial Reports for the Yagi 18A, Yagi 18B, Yagi 18C/D, Yagi 18K and Yagi 18E.
Yagi18 Approx wind loading (at 80mph) = 75 / 80N (greater if vertically polarised)
Examples of the major transmitters which can utilise a grouped Yagi18 are listed below.
Incredible as it may seem these aerials are actually Bench Marked.....
But it`s not just the fact it`s a “Bacofoil” aerial, it`s bleedin` gold for God`s sake !
Who would want one of these on their house ?
Answers on a post card to :
A.T.V,
“1970s TV Competition Reminiscences”,
419 Langsett Rd,
Sheffield,
S6 2LL
We didn`t like having to send in postcards did we ?
Ohh no.
What we really wanted to do was pay through the nose to waste our time phoning up premium rate phone lines instead ! Yes Siree Boss Hogg !
Anyway, back to Benchmarked aerials. But, and it`s a significant but, just because an
aerial is not benchmarked does not mean that it is in any way inferior. Quite apart from the fact that there are four different levels of Benchmarking (so you have to be specific about what you mean) most grouped variants of the same model of aerial are not Benchmarked whilst the wideband version is Benchmarked ! Bearing in mind that at over its designed for frequencies the grouped model will perform better than the wideband (sometimes by a large margin) this seems somewhat bizarre. With a bit of background information the explanation is not hard to comprehend. It costs the aerial manufacturers up to one thousand pounds to
put an aerial through the Benchmarking process so they will only do this for products
which they will sell a fair number of and/or make a fair bit of money on. When you
realise that widebands outsell grouped aerials by a large margin (most aerial suppliers
-
In short, a version (usually the wideband) of all our recommended aerials is Benchmarked.
But, as far as I`m concerned, it`s irrelevant. I`ve done my own tests thanks.
See “the wrong aerial for Crystal Palace” (or any A group transmitter)
We sometimes get people asking to buy “the best aerial you stock, regardless of cost”. Unfortunately, contrary to what others may tell you (particularly if they`re trying to sell you an expensive antenna.....), there is no such thing as a “best aerial”. It all depends on the signal strength in your area and (if you`re in a poor spot) which transmitter you are on.
Basically I have made a decision to only stock the best aerial of each type that anyone might require, and days of testing (by my good self) ensures I can say this with a certain amount of authority. Therefore the simple answer is that all of our aerials are the best ! Any aerial (or indeed any product) we stock will be a top notch product, because, to put it simply, if it wasn`t we wouldn`t stock it. Incidentally, unlike most suppliers, we endeavour to provide spares for aerials purchased from us.
The Log Periodics are amongst our cheaper aerials but if you live in a strong or medium signal area they are the best aerials to use, “better” than an XB22WB ! Similarly if you live in a marginal area but can utilise a grouped antenna, a grouped Yagi18 is more suitable than the aforementioned 22 bay wideband X Beam, despite being much cheaper.......
After much experimentation and research we have settled on seven types of aerial.
DM Log Periodic Wideband (For good signal areas)
Log 40 Log Periodic Wideband (For medium to medium/poor signal areas)
Yagi18 A / B / CD / K / E or XB10 A / B / K (For poor signal areas)
DY14 Wideband (For poor signal areas)
XB16 A / B / K / E (For the most marginal signal areas)
XB22 Wideband (For the most marginal signal areas)
See our advice for which aerial to use with which transmitter.
ATV`s Choice Of Aerials & The Great Wideband Debate
Whether to use a wideband or not is a source of much debate. The CAI and the BBC recommend the installation of wideband aerials. For most installs, i.e. those in strong or medium signal strength areas (90% of homes, or more ? ), we agree with them and advise the installation of one or other of the Log Periodics, which are wideband anyway. If your transmitter is a wideband we would (obviously) also advise fitting a wideband even if you live in a marginal signal area.
So far so good.
However if you live in a poor reception area and your transmitter is grouped, many of those in the aerial industry, diverge quite markedly from this blanket wideband advice. As shown on the Aerials page (amongst others) a grouped antenna will give you significantly more signal, and even the BBC agree with this, see middle of page 2 on the linked PDF. In fact a little further down the same page they advise the fitment of a “high gain” aerial for areas of low signal strength. But, if you are on an A group transmitter, there is no such thing as a high gain wideband aerial ! Reading this customer aerial report (and the others) is very educational on this point. To a lesser extent this high gain wideband inferiority also applies to B group transmitters and K group transmitters.
So what is the explanation for this inconsistency ?
Well, being a cynic I think it`s yet another example of the modern trend to “pass the buck”.It`s easy for “the powers that be” to recommend widebands because they cover themselves if (and it is an if...) they ever decide to start transmitting out of band in the future. But it isn`t them who have to put up with a potentially weaker signal. It isn`t them who have to try and explain to a customer that they should put up with a poor picture with the excuse that “your signal should improve at DSO, by the way, how do you want to pay, cash or cheque ?”.
The customers usual answer ?
I think you can guess.
Maybe we should invite the BBC or CAI down to make excuses to the customer for us.
What do you think their answer to our request would be ?
I think you can guess.
Haven`t I just said that ?
You see, wideband aerials in a marginal signal area ? It isn`t that simple......
The post DSO frequencies have now been released by Ofcom so you can check for yourself whether you may end up needing a wideband in the foreseeable future, though we have added the information to our site where relevant. Even the advent of HDTV in 2010 did not require any more widebands than before. There is the possibility of some additional local TV channels via the the "interleaved spectrum", plus a chance of 2 or 3 more MUXES being transmitted between CHs 31 and 37. But the great majority of people will pick up all these on an aerial of the original group for the relevant transmitter. Whatever the truth of the matter I`d have thought that people should be more bothered about getting a reliable digital signal now, and for what`s definitely planned, rather than risking a less reliable signal for what may, or may not, happen at some time in the future.
Finally, we are often asked whether our recommended aerials are “CAI Benchmarked”. The simple answer is that some are and some aren`t. Why ? Well, as with wideband aerials, this is not a simple question..... We agree that any attempt to encourage the manufacture and sale of better quality aerials is a good thing. Most Benchmarked aerials are of good quality, though structural durability is not taken into account in the scheme. In fact it has to be said that a few of them are “Bacofoil” aerials, no names no packdrill.....
Oh go on then, SLX/Labgear/Philex/Maxview.

We are more than willing to give advice to those actually purchasing from us.
Could those only seeking information please just find the answer somewhere on this site,
or ring an aerial installer local to them, or call the reception advice phone numbers.
If you have to go wideband and you live in a poorreception area we recommend our DY14WB. The DY14 Wideband is a “Double Yagi” type aerial and is well made, in fact These antennas also have significantly better build quality than any X Beam aerial I`ve seen. The aerial has a "balun", a cradle and a tilting clamp for poles up to 2”.
Size for size the DY14WB is aerial is the best wideband I`ve ever come across, in fact its performance is even reasonable in the A and B groups, though obviously a decent group A aerial (or our XB16 group B) will have more gain in the relevant groups frequencies.
The DY14 is a good choice for someone needing to fit a high gain wideband aerial in the loft because it`s only 5 ft long, which is pretty compact for an aerial with this amount of gain.
For gain figures see test results. For dimensions see table.
See Aerial Reports on the DY14WB
Approx wind loading (at 80mph) = 90N (greater if vertically polarised)
Due to wind loading considerations if fitting to a 10ft pole we advise using the 2” variety.
DY14 Wideband up at our test site.
(note how the cradles are fitted perpendicularly to the dipoles/directors)
If you are unsure of the transmitter you will use, but you are sure you need
a “high gain” aerial (most people don`t need one....) then this is the antenna
I`d go for.
The XB10 A / B / K is an alternative to the equivalent Yagi18 for poor areas of reception.
Although the XB10s have marginally more gain we normally recommend the grouped Yagi18s for outside installs because of their exceptional build quality. However, if you`re using the aerial in a loft it`s often a good idea to go for an XB10 because their smaller size enables more flexibility over where to install them within the roof space, furthermore they can also be end mounted (though we recommend cradle mounting the aerial for external installs). For an X Beam type these aerials are pretty strongly constructed and come with a cradle and tilting clamp for poles up to 2”.
For gain figures see test results. For dimensions see table.
XB10 Approx wind loading (at 80mph) = 95N (greater if vertically polarised)
Due to wind loading considerations if fitting to a 10ft pole we advise using the 2” variety.
Examples of the major transmitters which can utilise an XB10A / B / K are listed below.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log Periodic.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a Yagi18A for outside installs, or an XB10A (particularly in the loft).
Poorest signal locations should use an XB16A.
See our test results for these aerials.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log Periodic.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a Yagi18B for outside installs, or an XB10B (particularly in the loft).
Poorest signal locations should use an XB16B.
See our test results for these aerials.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log Periodic.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a Yagi18C/D* or a DY14WB.
Weakest signal locations should use an XB16E.
See our test results for these aerials.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log Periodic.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a Yagi18E or a DY14WB.
Weakest signal locations should use an XB16E.
See our test results for these aerials.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log Periodic.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a Yagi18K or a XB10K, the latter aerial particularly if mounted in a loft.
Weakest signal locations should use an XB16K.
See our test results for these aerials.

Strong signal areas should use a DM Log.
Medium areas should use a Log 40.
Weak reception areas should use a DY14WB.
Those with the weakest reception should use an XB22WB.
See our test results for these aerials.

The K group aerials we stock outperform the equivalent wideband up to CH55.
Rumster Forest (Switched)
Waltham (Switched) (only MUX 4 is out of band, also see group C/D) *
Note, even the XB22WB does not give high gain at the bottom of the frequency range, there is no wideband aerial that will do this.
If you`ve found this site informative and, hopefully, interesting as well,
please help us increase the number of people reading it.
Pre Digital Switchover (DSO)
Hannington (also see group B)
Hemel Hempstead
Tunbridge Wells
Post Digital Switchover (DSO)
Beacon Hill (also see group C/D) * (Switched)
Hemel Hempstead
Llanddona (also see group C/D) * (Switched)
Sudbury (Switched)
Tacolneston (also see group C/D) * (Switched)
Pre Digital Switchover (DSO)
Fenham
Post Digital Switchover (DSO)
Bromsgrove (Switched)
Craigkelly (Switched)
Idle (Switched)
Lark Stoke (Switched)
Nottingham (Switched)
Sandy Heath (Switched)
Sheffield (Switched)
The Wrekin (Switched)
Note. Because wideband antennas have a poor response at the bottom of the band why fit a “high gain” wideband on a K group transmitter ? If the site really is in a poor spot a high gain K group aerial should be used, e.g. an XB10K or even an XB16K. On the other hand if the signal is strong (or medium) then by definition it doesn`t need a “high gain” antenna anyway ! Under these circumstances a Log Periodic should be fitted instead.
Pre Digital Switchover (DSO)
Dover
Limvady
Midhurst
Whitehawk Hill
Post Digital Switchover (DSO)
Angus (Switched)
Beacon Hill (Switched)
Brierley Hill (Switched)
Carmel (Switched)
Dover
Huntshaw Cross (Switched)
Knock More (Switched)
Limvady
Mendip (Switched)
Midhurst
Oxford (Switched)
Rosneath (Switched)
Selkirk (Switched)
Whitehawk Hill
Winter Hill (Switched)
Pre Digital Switchover (DSO)
Chatton
Guildford
Hannington (excl analogue C4, or group E)
Post Digital Switchover (DSO)
Black Hill (Switched)
Chatton
Emley Moor (Switched)
Guildford
Keelylang Hill (Switched)
Moel Y Parc (Switched)
Presely (Switched)
Redruth (Switched)
Rosemarkie (Switched)
Sutton Coldfield (Switched)
Tunbridge Wells
Wenvoe (Switched)
Pre Digital Switchover (DSO)
Brougher Mountain
Divis (excl analogue C5)
Post Digital Switchover (DSO)
Blaenplwyf (Switched)
Brougher Mountain
Caldbeck (Switched)
Caradon Hill (Switched)
Darvel (Switched)
Divis
Durris (Switched)
Fenham
Fenton (Switched)
Kilvey Hill (Switched)
Lancaster (Switched)
Pendle Forest (Switched)
Ridge Hill (Switched)
Stockland Hill (Switched)
Major A group transmitters
Note. Due to Wideband antennas poor response at the bottom of the band nobody should ever fit a “high gain” wideband on any A group transmitter. If the site is in a poor spot an A group aerial should be used. On the other hand if the signal is strong (or medium) then by definition it doesn`t need a “high gain” antenna anyway ! Under these circumstances a Log Periodic should be fitted instead.
See “the wrong aerial for Crystal Palace” (or any A group transmitter)
Major Transmitters (and which aerial to use with which transmitter)
For the full list of the 80 main digital transmitters see Digital Transmitters.
Also see “Which Transmitter Am I on ?”
Finally in the weakest signal areas we would fit or sell the XB16 in group A, group B, group K and group E. For wideband there`s the XB22WB, picture below. These are all X Beam type antennas but they are still of reasonably strong construction, unlike some of that type, and all come with a cradle & tilting clamp (for poles up to 2”). The XB16s are the highest gain grouped aerials we have tested and I was amazed at how much signal they brought in.
Similarly the XB22WB has more gain than any other wideband we`ve tested, including the DY14WB, though it isn`t that much more ! However even the XB22WB does not give “high gain” at the bottom of the frequency range, I have never seen a wideband aerial which will do this. If you must have a wideband, and you`re sure you need more gain at the bottom of the band, your best option is to diplex an A group with an E group, or even an A group with another (high gain) wideband if you already have one of these.
For gain figures see test results For dimensions see table.
See Aerial Reports for the XB16A XB16B XB16K XB16E XB22WB.
Approx wind loading (at 80mph) = 120N to 140N (slightly greater if vertically polarised)
If fitting an XB16 or XB22 on a 10ft pole we strongly advise using one of 2” diameter.

The original C/D group aerials will probably work OK for all transmissions, though this is less likely for cheap crappy Contract aerials.

Below is a table with all the (approximate) dimensions of the antennas that we sell.
Note that although 6ft, 7ft or indeed 8ft sounds big, once it`s on your roof it wouldn`t usually look that big !
The wind loading figures are our own estimates, though we don`t think they`re that far out. It should be borne in mind that vertically polarising an aerial will increase its wind loading. Incidentally the approximate wind load figures for satellite dishes (at 80mph) are 300N for a 43cm x 53cm Sky zone 1 dish / 380N for a 60cm dish / 450N for a 60cm x 75cm zone 2 Sky dish / 1050N for a 1m dish (1 Kg = 9.81 Newtons). However, satellite dishes aren`t usually mounted on the end of long poles, which greatly increase the force on the bracket and the wall (or chimney) that it`s mounted on. Obviously the angle of the wind onto the dish is very significant, a southerly (i.e. onto the front of the dish) being the worst case.
We have given two figures for the length of each aerial, one is that from the first (front) element to the reflector and the other is the overall length of the boom. The XB10s can be end mounted if required, making them even more suitable for loft installations. However, for an outside install, we would not usually recommend end mounting an aerial of any appreciable size, as it will obviously put more strain/twisting forces on to the pole and its bracket. End mounting aerials can exert a very high torque and this was exceptionally annoying when I was undertaking aerial tests whilst there was wind about ! Log Periodics must be end mounted, but as can be seen from the table their wind loading is relatively low.
The dimensions for the reflector(s) are for the whole (double) unit.
XB22WB aerial at our test site.
Some of our customers need to transport the aerials after delivery ( particularly to avoid carriage supplements to NW Scotland and Northern Ireland ! ) so below we have a table showing the approximate sizes of the boxes which the aerials come in. These dimensions are also used by customers arranging their own collection, which, to some far flung addresses is cheaper than us organising the delivery through TNT.
XB16A aerial at our test site.
Do not confuse this aerial with smaller 10 bay A group X beam type aerials. As far as we`re aware there is no other A, B, or K group aerial of this gain available for retail in this country.
XB16 E aerial at our test site.

* See "covering all eventualities"

XB16 B / K aerial at our test site.
Do not confuse this aerial with smaller 10 bay B or K group X beam type aerials. As far as we`re aware there is no other B or K group aerial of this size/gain available for retail in this country.
We recommend Log Periodics for good or medium reception areas as they have even gain
characteristics across the band, decent anti-
The Log is one of the best antennas, particularly for digital (Freeview), which is why we and the broadcast authorities, use them wherever possible, see why choose a Log Periodic ?
For gain figures see these test results. For dimensions see this table.
See Aerial Reports for the DM Log Periodics and for the Log 40
Approx wind loading (at 80mph) = 35N / 40N (greater if vertically polarised)
We also stock a shorter 18 element version of the DM Log, the DM18 Log. It is only 2ft 6in long but has 1 to 2dB less gain than the standard DM Log. Suitable for those in strong signal areas requiring the smallest aerial.
Both aerials come with a tilting clamp for poles up to 2”, this can be useful if the transmitter is higher than your aerial.
If there is such a thing as a “universal aerial” (which there isn`t, but bear with me....) this is it. In most cases (90% of installations ?) you can`t go far wrong with a Log40 TV aerial, particularly if you need a wideband aerial. If you`re still short of gain then try adding a variable gain (capable of being turned down to a low level) mast head amp.
See wiring up a Log40.
When it comes to aerial choice, remember the basic rule (which the broadcast authorities also use...), if you can use a Log, use a Log !
The perfect aerial for medium or medium to poor signal areas, pictured whilst on test up at our test site. These 40 element Logs are only available in wideband (c/w clamp [non tilt] for poles up to 2”).
Yagi18B up at our test site. Note Emley Moor in the background.
DY14WB on test at our shop. Note the use of a side pole to prevent the cradle affecting the performance of the aerial, although this would not be required if the aerial were mounted at the top of the pole, like the DY14 in the lower picture.
*

The original C/D group aerials will probably work OK for all transmissions, though this is less likely for cheap crappy Contract aerials.
*

The original C/D group aerials will probably work OK for all transmissions, though this is less likely for cheap crappy Contract aerials.
*